prefers-reduced-motion: Sometimes less movement is more

The prefers-reduced-motion media query detects whether the user has requested the operating system to minimize the amount of animation or motion it uses.

Thomas Steiner

Not everyone likes decorative animations or transitions, and some users outright experience motion sickness when faced with parallax scrolling, zooming effects, and more. The user preference media query prefers-reduced-motion lets you design a motion-reduced variant of your site for users who have expressed this preference.

Browser Support

  • Chrome: 74.
  • Edge: 79.
  • Firefox: 63.
  • Safari: 10.1.

Source

Too much motion in real life and on the web

The other day, I was ice skating with my kids. It was a lovely day, the sun was shining, and the ice rink was crammed with people ⛸. The only issue with that: I don't cope with crowds well. With so many moving targets, I fail to focus on anything, and end up lost and with a feeling of complete visual overload, almost like staring at an anthill 🐜.

Throng of feet of ice skating people.
Visual overload in real life.

Occasionally, the same can happen on the web: with flashing ads, fancy parallax effects, surprising reveal animations, autoplaying videos, and more, the web sometimes can be quite overwhelming… Happily, unlike in real life, there is a solution to that. The CSS media query prefers-reduced-motion lets developers create a variant of a page for users who, well, prefer reduced motion. This can consist of anything from refraining from having autoplaying videos to disabling certain purely decorative effects, to completely redesigning a page for certain users.

Before I dive into the feature, let me take one step back and think of what animations are used for on the web. If you want, you can also skip the background information and jump right into the technical details.

Animation on the web

Animation is oftentimes used to provide feedback to the user, for example, to let them know that an action was received and is being processed. For example, on a shopping website, a product could be animated to "fly" into a virtual shopping cart, depicted as an icon in the top-right corner of the site.

Another use case involves using motion to hack user perception by using a mixture of skeleton screens, contextual metadata, and low quality image previews to occupy a lot of the user's time and make the whole experience feel faster. The idea is to give context to the user of what's coming and meanwhile load in things as quickly as possible.

Finally, there are decorative effects like animated gradients, parallax scrolling, background videos, and several others. While many users enjoy such animations, some users dislike them because they feel distracted or slowed down by them. In the worst case, users may even suffer from motion sickness as if it were a real life experience, so for these users reducing animations is a medical necessity.

Motion-triggered vestibular spectrum disorder

Some users experience distraction or nausea from animated content. For example, scrolling animations can cause vestibular disorders when elements other than the main element associated with the scrolling move around a lot. For example, parallax scrolling animations can cause vestibular disorders because background elements move at a different rate than foreground elements. Vestibular (inner ear) disorder reactions include dizziness, nausea, and migraine headaches, and sometimes require bed rest to recover.

Remove motion on operating systems

Many operating systems have had accessibility settings for specifying a preference for reduced motion for a long time. The following screenshots show macOS Mojave's Reduce motion preference and Android Pie's Remove animations preference. When checked, these preferences cause the operating system to not use decorative effects like app launching animations. Applications themselves can and should honor this setting, too, and remove all unnecessary animations.

The macOS settings screen with the 'Reduce motion' checkbox checked.
The Android settings screen with the 'Remove animations' checkbox checked.

Remove motion on the web

Media Queries Level 5 brings the reduced motion user preference to the web as well. Media queries allow authors to test and query values or features of the user agent or display device independent of the document being rendered. The media query prefers-reduced-motion is used to detect if the user has set an operating system preference to minimize the amount of animation or motion it uses. It can take two possible values:

  • no-preference: Indicates that the user has made no preference in the underlying operating system. This keyword value evaluates as false in the boolean context.
  • reduce: Indicates that the user has set an operating system preference indicating that interfaces should minimize movement or animation, preferably to the point where all non-essential movement is removed.

Working with the media query from CSS and JavaScript contexts

As with all media queries, prefers-reduced-motion can be checked from a CSS context and from a JavaScript context.

To illustrate both, assume I have an important sign-up button that I want the user to click. I could define an attention-catching "vibrate" animation, but as a good web citizen I will only play it for those users who are explicitly OK with animations, but not everyone else, which can be users who have opted out of animations, or users on browsers that don't understand the media query.

/*
  If the user has expressed their preference for
  reduced motion, then don't use animations on buttons.
*/
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  button {
    animation: none;
  }
}

/*
  If the browser understands the media query and the user
  explicitly hasn't set a preference, then use animations on buttons.
*/
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) {
  button {
    /* `vibrate` keyframes are defined elsewhere */
    animation: vibrate 0.3s linear infinite both;
  }
}

To illustrate how to work with prefers-reduced-motion with JavaScript, imagine I have defined a complex animation with the Web Animations API. While CSS rules will be dynamically triggered by the browser when the user preference changes, for JavaScript animations I have to listen for changes myself, and then manually stop my potentially in-flight animations (or restart them if the user lets me):

const mediaQuery = window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)');
mediaQuery.addEventListener('change', () => {
  console.log(mediaQuery.media, mediaQuery.matches);
  // Stop JavaScript-based animations.
});

Note that the parentheses around the actual media query are obligatory:

Don't
window.matchMedia('prefers-reduced-motion: reduce');
Do
window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)');

Working with the media query from <picture> contexts

An interesting use case is to make playing of an animated AVIF, WebP, or GIF dependent on the media attribute. If (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) evaluates to true, it's safe to display the animated version, else the static version:

<picture>
  <!-- Animated versions. -->
  <source
    srcset="nyancat.avifs"
    type="image/avif"
    media="(prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference)"
  />
  <source
    srcset="nyancat.gif"
    type="image/gif"
    media="(prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference)"
  />
  <!-- Static versions. -->
  <img src="nyancat.png" alt="Nyan cat" width="250" height="250" />
</picture>

You can see the following example. Try toggling your device's motion preferences to see the difference.

The famous Nyan cat.

Discover the user's preferences at request time

The Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motion client hint header allows sites to obtain the user's motion preferences optionally at request time, allowing servers to inline the right CSS for performance reasons.

Demo

I have created a little demo based on Rogério Vicente's amazing 🐈 HTTP status cats. First, take a moment to appreciate the joke, it's hilarious and I'll wait. Now that you're back, let me introduce the demo. When you scroll, each HTTP status cat alternatingly appears from either the right or the left side. It's a buttery smooth 60 FPS animation, but as outlined before, some users may dislike it or even get motion sick by it, so the demo is programmed to respect prefers-reduced-motion. This even works dynamically, so users can change their preference on-the-fly, no reload required. If a user prefers reduced motion, the non-necessary reveal animations are gone, and just the regular scrolling motion is left. The following screencast shows the demo in action:

Video of the prefers-reduced-motion demo app

Conclusions

Respecting user preferences is key for modern websites, and browsers are exposing more and more features to enable web developers to do so. Another launched example is prefers-color-scheme, which detects if the user prefers a light or dark color scheme. You can read everything about prefers-color-scheme in my article Hello Darkness, My Old Friend 🌒.

The CSS Working Group is standardizing more user preference media queries like prefers-reduced-transparency (detects if the user prefers reduced transparency), prefers-contrast (detects if the user has requested the system to increase or decrease the amount of contrast between adjacent colors), and inverted-colors (detects if the user prefers inverted colors).

(Bonus) Forcing reduced motion on all websites

Not every site will use prefers-reduced-motion, or maybe not significantly enough for your taste. If you, for whatever reason, want to stop motion on all websites, you actually can. One way to make this happen is to inject a style sheet with the following CSS into every web page you visit. There are several browser extensions out there (use at your own risk!) that allow for this.

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  *,
  ::before,
  ::after {
    animation-delay: -1ms !important;
    animation-duration: 1ms !important;
    animation-iteration-count: 1 !important;
    background-attachment: initial !important;
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
    transition-duration: 1ms !important;
    transition-delay: -1ms !important;
  }
}

The way this works is that the previous CSS overrides the durations of all animations and transitions to such a short time that they are not noticeable anymore. As some websites depend on an animation to be run in order to work correctly (maybe because a certain step depends on the firing of the animationend event), the more radical animation: none !important; approach wouldn't work. Even the previous hack is not guaranteed to succeed on all websites (for example, it can't stop motion that was initiated using the Web Animations API), so be sure to deactivate it when you notice breakage.

Acknowledgements

Massive shout-out to Stephen McGruer who has implemented prefers-reduced-motion in Chrome and—together with Rob Dodson—has also reviewed this document. Hero image by Hannah Cauhepe on Unsplash.